Friday, April 30, 2010

KingCast says Neil Tobin, Mass Division of Banks still trying to railroad Black female mortgage broker Cat Gibbons on Stated Income Deals.

These cats are shameless. Hearing Officer Neil Tobin (speaking for the DOB apparently) rejected her proposed modifications to a Confidentiality Agreement that would explicitly allow her to file requested documents in subsequent court actions. Obviously she has a right to appeal any adverse administrative action using relevant documents from the proceeding, any other approach is Unconstitutional.

So she signed the Agreement as is but now they have issued her another letter attempting to modify the Agreement and tell her she can't even show the documents to her witnesses who will be testifying at her hearing. That's bullshit and they know it. Bull. Shit. And it's never going to pass Constitutional muster.

They have also inserted another phantom letter that was never in her file, the same way they did at MCAD.

And they still have not provided her with:

a) her complete file, including correspondence both ways,
b) a list of the names of brokers who did Stated Deals because she will be able to show that they came after her arbitrarily and/or in racist and retaliatory fashion because there were other brokers with complaint histories against them and lower ratings against whom the DOB did NOT seek enforcement proceedings. Cat Gibbons and Miracle Mortgage did not deceive any buyers or put them in Harm's Way, she followed the guidelines of her lender.... who was not punished by DOB, BTW. Read more.

Thursday, April 29, 2010

KingCast reminder to Sam Shaulson, Melissa Rodriguez and Citibank: I've been winning oral advocacy awards and trials for years, guys.

Rev it up, boys and girls. State Debate finals, 1979 IIRC, and BLSA Second Place entire Midwest Region, 1992 and State v. Doyle, 1999. Juries tend to like me even as you and other corporate haters like American Tower imply I'm a Dangerous, Threatening Black Man. As D.S.'s Affidavit (and "American Lawyer" at I emailed to Sam last night shows, they were just pissed-off because I reported underpayment of my trainees to the DOL, which fined.... err.... settled with them for $290K.

Anyway, you care to find out? If you do, I do.
PS: KingCast, Daniel S. Sogg, Dr. Joshua A. Breslau. We don't play. We come to win.

It's gnarly.

KingCast reminder, don't forget this nonsense from the Courts in Gillenwater v. Barron and Denner.

Excuse me? "The way you went about it?" With all due respect (and not much is due, actually) WTF is THAT supposed to mean? Did he threaten violence? No. Did he threaten to reveal personal secrets about either of the attorneys? No. Was there a threat to National Security? No.

I forgot about how ridiculous Mr. Gillenwater's situation was, right here in the Good Ol' U.S.A. Then you add it to Citibank and Morgan Lewis, Sam Shaulson, Melissa Rodriguez and Benjamin Velella's nonsense and you have one nasty fornication fest. Best wear protection when you're working with Citibank skanks.
VH1 Reality Show Bus Crashes In California Causing Major Slut Spill

KingCast tells Sam Shaulson, Melissa Rodriguez, Morgan Lewis & Citibank, "You cannot stop proliferation of my Citibank scumbag lies and racism video."

Sooooo....How does Citibank stop proliferation of this video in the coming days, weeks, months and years?

Answer: Unless they settle with me, they don't. The ACLU has got my back like a MF, and any attempt to shut it down has to come before a Jury because I'll file a Jury Demand in my Answer to any complaint they could conceivably issue. Too bad I forgot to put in the sexism cases as well, here's one for $33M. What a bunch of dirty rotten scoundrels, oppression personified ('cos remember the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that corporations are persons now, Citizens United v. FEC 558 U.S. ____ 2010).

The Jury will be, like, "he's my hero!"

I've got law students getting ready to distribute the DVDs once I order them up, I'm not even going to bother pressing them myself, too time consuming for the volume planned.

With that, I'm firing up the 650R (it needs new skins ASAP, funny how once they start going it's a quick trip downhill LOL) and headed over to the Post Office to file this Rule 3.3/3.4 Ethics Complaint on Citibank lying lawyer Benjamin Velella.
-The KingCaster.

Wednesday, April 28, 2010

KingCast asks lying Citibank Lawyer Ben Velella, Esq: "You ready for your Rule 3.3 Ethics Complaint, Sir?"

Wait for it.

28 April, 2010
Dear Reviewing Counsel:
Please review the attached DVD and documentation with all the earnestness at your command.

Benjamin D. Velella, Esq. misrepresented to licensed counsel and to an opposing party that:
A. No one at Citibank Chinatown branch told Derrick Gillenwater that the branch would cash his check once he updated his State ID to go along with his current Social Security Card.

B. No one at Citibank Chinatown branch told Derrick Gillenwater when we returned to the branch that the manager was not available.
With all due respect, these are bald-faced lies told in contravention of Rules 3.3 and 3.4 (and probably others) Candor toward the tribunal and opposing parties.
You can hear Derrick Gillenwater say as much in the video.
Equally important is the FACT that my lawyer told them to maintain the video from the Chinatown branch but they have not, and not only is that spoliation of evidence, it was a further attempt to cover up the lies because the video from both visits could be narrated and shown in order to support my contentions. Accord Kippenhan v. Chaulk, 428 Mass. 124 (1998).
Sanctions may be appropriate for the spoliation of evidence that occurs even before an action has been commenced, if a litigant or its expert knows or reasonably should know that the evidence might be relevant to a possible action. See Nally v. Volkswagen of Am., Inc., supra at 197-198; Lewy v. Remington Arms Co., 836 F.2d 1104, 1112 (8th Cir. 1988); Fire Ins. Exch. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 103 Nev. 648, 651 (1987). The threat of a lawsuit must be sufficiently apparent, however, that a reasonable person in the spoliator's position would realize, at the time of spoliation, the possible importance of the evidence to the resolution of the potential dispute.

With all due respect, when you get a letter from a lawyer threatening litigation and asking for video to be maintained, I think that effectively crosses the threshold contemplated by Chaulk.

Update: Read the specific warning to Counselor Velella on 26 May 2009:

Dear Attorney Velella:

Don't forget the express representation from your Chinatown branch that they would honor the check when Mr. Gillenwater got his new State I.D. card.

They then reneged on that promise, all of which should be stored in your video vault.


Posted by opencourts at 8:43 AM

Respectfully submitted,
Christopher King, J.D.


Tuesday, April 27, 2010

KingCast presents: The Citibank Defense.... "You were sarcastic when you asked to open a bank account." Watch for the Post Hearing Brief.

Sooooo.... An excerpt from the Post Hearing Brief, when in doubt bring in the minority lawyer to defend discrimination cases..... Today at hearing Respondent’s counsel said that Citibank’s history of proved lies and deceit were not relevant, yet it was Citibank who started this dirty game by referencing items in my past back to 1996, and that’s a FACT.
It’s their Modus Operandi, as noted by several legal bloggers. Do whatever you can to stain the victim, just ask Madison Square Garden victims Courtney Prince and Anucha Browne Sanders:

Writes one lawyer at Main Street U.S.A. blog, 19 April 2007.
Kind of a come hither photo for a law firm bio, no? People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Rodriguez is a fifth year lawyer with an impressive pedigree (Yale, Columbia Law), but not a lot of experience to be the lead lawyer in a high-profile case. I wonder if she is the lead attorney on the case? Or is she just being used to put out the smear so the big name partner who is handling the case doesn't have to get his/her hands dirty? Is MSG using a woman (and a minority) as window dressing? I handled many sex discrimination cases where young female lawyers were included on the defense team for that very reason.

Today I continued to show how the teller had no credibility as well as the FACT that Manager Carlo Caramanna definitely exercised his authority to be the Decision Maker to DENY me the right to open a bank account. No matter how hard Citibank tries, they cannot make that go away.

Respondent Citibank raised Derrick Gillenwater when they wanted to, in order to say that the bank offered him to open an account. But I said hey if you bring him in penny you bring him in dollar and he clearly says that Citibank reneged on the promise to cash his check when he got updated ID. This means that local Counsel Benjamin Vellela is a complete liar too, as shown in the movie. Then they say "This is the first time we've heard that Derrick Gillenwater was reacting to another statement when he said "watch your back."

Well that's not my fault that the scumbags at the bank didn't tell their counsel what really happened. We'll get there in Superior Court if necessary.

Lastly as to the allegation that I was "sarcastic" about opening an account, I said I was snippy or somewhat sarcastic to the extent that Carlo Carmanna had already threatened to arrest me when he picked up the phone. They can't get away from that as we move toward Superior Court I will subpoena that video, and when a Jury looks at my body language they will know I was not creating the disturbance that Citibank alleges. And as noted, how sarcastic was I really being, considering:

a) all of my hard work in getting ACL/Proskauer to review the case;
b) asked Carla Caramanna for the name and card of his supervisor.

Their position is so absurd, they acknowledge that I asked for the card but why on Earth would I ask for such a thing unless I meant business about opening an account? Citibank is trying to stand common sense on its head, once again. How can Morgan Lewis Attorneys keep their heads up as they try to defend this case? Melissa Rodriguez seems to be having a tough time at it, photographed in an open lobby, not in a hearing.


Sunday, April 25, 2010

KingCast tells legislative loser and waste product Martha McLeod: I will sue your ass for Defamation. Wait for it.

Miss Martha, you published the following comment to third parties:

"I was personally subjected to threats of physical and sexual violence by members of this community and their supporters, like Chris King, the last time this bill was debated."

Sexual violence, what about Bruce McKay and his Penis-shaped knife and the 10 page complaint from Ms. B (see item 13) that Chief Montminy and Selectmen ignored. Was your hubby a Selectman then? Was he a Selectman when Angela McKay filed for that Restraining Order? Did you try to help her?

You are a deceitful, despicable legislator and I will sue you for Defamation. You put up or shut up. If you had any such threats from me you would have come after me like your idiot friend Kelly Ayotte, who tried and FAILED.

Also you told a lie about State Rep Gionet, maybe he'll sue your ass too.

That's all you need to know right now, I will publish the full text of your tirade later. I don't know who you think you're [expletive deleted] with, but you are one Bad Apple, a rotten pig, and we're not the two and I'm not the one. You're all pissed-off because I called your hubby on the mat in the Jig is Up post.

Related: Marinova v. Jessica Van Sack, Boston Herald, Channel 7.

Saturday, April 24, 2010

KingCast, NAACP and NYSE present: Final Citibank is Racist video.

Sooo.....I keep remembering things that make me laugh, such as the fact that Sam Shaulson and Citibank call me unprofessional, yet the NYSE welcomed me with open arms last week while the same institution fined Citigroup $1M. When I finish this short film I'll get to work on the America SCORES short film. This final video will go up some time late tomorrow, then I'll press up scores of DVDs and send them off to all of Sam Shaulson and Morgan Lewis' opposing counsel from now until the day I die. It's a Free Country, that's an exercise of the First Amendment, and heck seeing as Sam thinks his clients and he have done no wrong they will appreciate the free publicity. Even though he clearly lied about the fact that the Decision Maker in my particular case was not a female, black, but rather a male, Caucasian, one Carlo Caramanna.

Here is the rough cut. Meanwhile you can read all about the NAACP racism lawsuit and the NYSE fines right here.

Friday, April 16, 2010

KingCast smiles as Boston Globe covers Joanna Marinova's CORI Defamation Action against racist, lying Boston Herald and Channel 7.

Watch it here, Blam! I'm watching it now, but I already told you so here. I know all about writing for a large daily newspaper back 20 friggin' years ago, and I know these guys violate every canon of ethics possible in collaborating with the DOC scumbags to try to put down the reasonable efforts toward prison reform established and maintained by Darrell Jones, Ms. Marinova and others. But Darrell is really The Man.

Note: One of the panelists said the Herald was addressing a security breach but that's false because the story doesn't speak to that in any way, shape or form. But it does repeatedly speak to phantom sex acts.

Note: Dan Kennedy raises an important point about confidentiality of sources at 2:57 but really the problem is that it's a CORI violation AND a confidential source. That violation of the Law is all the Court needs to ORDER production of the witness, I have provided legal analysis of this already, duh. Globe Newspaper Co. v. District Attorney for Middle Dist., 439 Mass. 374, 788 NE2d 513 (2003) read para. 5. But Jessica Van Sack may indeed find herself in the exact same situation that Toni Locy was in, facing contempt of court charges in that $5.8M Settlement in Hatfill v. NYTimes, infra, for failing to name confidential sources BECAUSE OF THE ILLEGALITY INVOLVED. Hell everyone knows I'm all about Reporter's Privilege but as Michelle Malkin pointed out Judge Walton had some cautionary words for journalists on Tuesday, but he saved his harshest judgments for the unidentified officials who linked Dr. Hatfill to the anthrax investigation in the news media.
“There’s not a scintilla of evidence to suggest Dr. Hatfill had anything to do with it,” the judge said, yet the public notoriety has “destroyed his life.”

Which is exactly what Jessica Van Sack and the other merry band of illegal pranksters did to Joanna Marinova.

Note: Callie Crossley misspoke when she raised the prison element because when the audio tapes of Darrell Jones' discussions with elected officials are published here -- and only here first -- you will see that people did in fact support the prisons and Mr. Jones' efforts at curbing Youth Violence and recidivism. Watch the damn Chronicle video right here and CBS video here. You think we're effin' around, we're not effin' around, we're here to kick ass and take names, dude.

Also, a police officer is a public figure with respect to Defamation but Ms. Marinova is not. Even if she were somehow a public figure per Hatfill v. NYTimes, the standard for false statement and reckless disregard has been met. See Rotkiewicz v. Sadowsky, 431 Mass. 748 (2000).

Learn about Darrell Jones here:
He also may have been wrongly convicted, wait for details on his trial soon.
KingCast: When it comes to Civil Rights, I go for the jugular and you haters can't do a damn thing about it. Cocky I am, and built to stay that way and I'll bear no compunction to tell it right to your face. Archive EVERYTHING.

Thursday, April 15, 2010

KingCast reminds Harvery Silverglate: Scheibel prosecutes bullies when they harm white girls, but she rewards them for bullying nigger Jason Vassell.

Dear Attorney Silverglate:

I read your columns frequently and typically agree with you. In fact, I agree with your recent column that asks whether Beacon Hill is being bullied into passing legislation that is arguably antithetical to the First Amendment in the wake of the tragic suicide of Phoebe Prince. You wrote
Newspaper columns and editorials praised Northwestern District Attorney Elizabeth Scheibel’s forceful response to the Prince incident

But here's where you need to complete your analysis with a reference back to Jason Vassell: The same Elizabeth Scheibel who is pressing for the legislation on school bullying didn't give a damn when two white drunken dirtbags named Jon Bosse and John Bowes dropped them niggerbombs on Jason Vassell, broke his window, charged into his building and broke his nose. In fact, she didn't even prosecute one of them at all, and never levied charges for criminal destruction of property or public intoxication against either of these men, who have thus far shown themselves to be quite the waste of human protoplasm, arguments for retroactive abortion IMO. Extensive KingCast video and picture essay on last month's hearing is right here.

Seriously Harvey, how can you excuse those (in)actions?

You cannot excuse those (in)actions.

The difference between the bullying in the school case and the hate crimes in the Vassell case that were given a milquetoast prosecution by Scheibel is that a hate crime is something that is motivated out of animus toward someone solely because of their immutable characteristics as defined by the United States Supreme Court. To me, that makes it a separate crime because that sort of thing is what has torn our country apart since Day One and the government has a compelling governmental interesting in addressing it.

But then what do I know about the First Amendent and Free Speech? I dunno, ask Proskauer, Rose + the ACLU, Derrick Gillenwater, Jeffrey Denner, Kevin Barron and Harvard Citzen Media, the Harvard folks having agreed with me that Courts in Boston were actively engaged in Unconstitutional Prior Restraint against surprise, surprise, ANOTHER BLACK MAN, some call us niggers, but whatever dude surely you get the point.

In fact, I've told you about all of that, you're on my email distribution list. But then what do I know about hate crimes, having hosted a hate crimes forum at Case Western Law School when I was simultaneously clerking for the Ohio AG's Office and noted Civil Rights/Criminal Defense Attorney Terry Gilbert. This was probably some time before John Bowes made his thug life known to the Free World by, inter alia, pouring beer on women and calling them "cunt" and "whore."

Lookit: I'm not here to mince words about these assholes, and I'm certainly not going to keep a Civil Tongue about Attorney Sheibel, she's a Janus-faced, hypocritical racist pig and I'm quite glad to note as much for the record.

Click to enlarge, read to be outraged. The one on the right, replete with your typical drunken angry sexually insecure white male misogynist "whore, cunt" ramblings is but one of six (6) different incidences of violence in which Jon Bosse and John Bowes have been involved in since 2003, some involving axe blades and handles, others involving the nigger bomb, etc. etc. these guys are real dirtbags, totally. Here's some back story.

Reel news for real people, the bullshit they can keep. I don't have time, Sir and neither do you. Let the chips fall as they may.

Friday, April 9, 2010

KingCast smiles as Boston Globe covers Joanna Marinova's CORI Defamation Action against

My the proteas sure are pretty at Todd & Weld. That's good because the litigation is about to be ugly as hell. Here's the story and my comment.

PoorMarsha, you are quite wrong. I have all the documents and the Herald and Channel 7 are going down, down, down. The charges were DISMISSED, the documents are on my blog, hahahaaa....

Who do you think took Ms. Marinova over to Todd & Weld?

I got radio shows, videos, all of that.

Have a nice day.

-The KingCaster.

PS: Dan Kennedy's take on it.

PPS: Here's a crucial post from Christmas evening.

PPPS: Racist, you ask? Yep. Just ask "Boone the Coon." More background on DOC investigations, including the Harshbarger report, is here.